Search MAFLOnline
Subscribe to MAFL Online

 

Contact Me

I can be contacted via Tony.Corke@gmail.com

 

Latest Information


 

Latest Posts
« MAFL 2013 : Team Dashboard for Round 21 | Main | MAFL 2013 : Team Dashboard for Round 19 »
Sunday
Aug112013

MAFL 2013 : Team Dashboard for Round 20

It's been a little while since we looked at the strengths and weaknesses of each team in terms of the metrics on the MAFL Team Dashboard, so let's do that this week: 

  • Adelaide, 12th on the ladder, are 17th on Own Conversion rate, but 3rd in final terms
  • Brisbane, 13th on the ladder, are 18th on Own Conversion rate, but 8th on Opponent Conversion rate and in final terms 
  • Carlton, 9th on the ladder, are 13th on Own Conversion rate and in final terms, but 1st on Opponent Conversion rate
  • Collingwood, 5th on the ladder, are 13th on Opponent Conversion rate, but 4th on Opponent Scoring Shots per game
  • Essendon, 7th on the ladder, are 11th on Opponent Conversion rate, but 4th in final terms
  • Fremantle, 4th on the ladder, are 14th on Own Scoring Shots per game, but 1st on Opponent Scoring Shots per game
  • Geelong, 2nd on the ladder, are 16th on Opponent Conversion rate, but 1st on 3rd Quarter performances
  • Hawthorn, 1st on the ladder, are 9th on Opponent Conversion rate, but 1st on Own Scoring Shots per game
  • Kangaroos, 11th on the ladder, are 11th on 3rd Quarter performances (yes, 11th is the worst ranking they have on any metric), but 1st on 1st Quarter performances and on Own Conversion rate
  • Melbourne, 17th on the ladder, are 18th on Own Scoring Shots per game and on 2nd Quarter performances, but 10th on Opponent Conversion rate
  • Port Adelaide, 8th on the ladder, are 15th on Opponent Conversion rate, but 1st in final terms
  • Richmond, 6th on the ladder, are 14th on Own Conversion rate, but 4th on Opponent Conversion rate
  • St Kilda, 16th on the ladder, are 17th on performances in final terms, but 7th on Opponent Conversion rate
  • Sydney, 3rd on the ladder, are 11th on performances in final terms, but 1st on 2nd Quarter performances
  • West Coast, 10th on the ladder, are 18th on Opponent Conversion rate, but 4th on Own Scoring Shots per game and in 3rd terms
  • Western Bulldogs, 15th on the ladder, are 18th on performances in 1st terms, but 6th on Own Conversion rate

Having read that list, it's probably no surprise that the weakest rank correlation between competition ladder position and ranking on any single metric is for Opponent Conversion rate, for which it is only +0.18. The next-weakest correlation is with Own Conversion rate where it's +0.51.

Strongest correlations are for Opponent Scoring Shots per game (+0.93), and for performances in 2nd Quarters (+0.92). Surprisingly - to me anyway - the correlation between performances in final terms and competition ladder position is a relatively weak +0.60.

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>